Friday, January 06, 2006

Court to decide if Jesus is REAL

ROME (Reuters) - Forget the U.S. debate over intelligent design versus evolution.
Addy's question of the day:
So that whole "Seperation of Church and State" thing is ok to omit when an atheist needs to prove HIS point?
I couldn't believe this when I read it and I had to post the entire article for everyone to read

An Italian court is tackling Jesus -- and whether the Roman Catholic Church may be breaking the law by teaching that he existed 2,000 years ago.
The case pits against each other two men in their 70s, who are from the same central Italian town and even went to the same seminary school in their teenage years.

I can just hear the music from "The Peoples Court" playing as I read this.

The defendant, Enrico Righi, went on to become a priest writing for the parish newspaper. The plaintiff, Luigi Cascioli, became a vocal atheist who, after years of legal wrangling, is set to get his day in court later this month.
"I started this lawsuit because I wanted to deal the final blow against the Church, the bearer of obscurantism and regression," Cascioli told Reuters.
Cascioli says Righi, and by extension the whole Church, broke two Italian laws. The first is "Abuso di Credulita Popolare" (Abuse of Popular Belief) meant to protect people against being swindled or conned. The second crime, he says, is "Sostituzione di Persona", or impersonation.
"The Church constructed Christ upon the personality of John of Gamala," Cascioli claimed, referring to the 1st century Jew who fought against the Roman army.
A court in Viterbo will hear from Righi, who has yet to be indicted, at a January 27 preliminary hearing meant to determine whether the case has enough merit to go forward.

"In my book, The Fable of Christ, I present proof Jesus did not exist as a historic figure. He must now refute this by showing proof of Christ's existence," Cascioli said.

How does he have PROOF that JC didn't exist, when there are scientists and anthropologists (who are NOT religious) that have agreed, from historical data, that there was indeed a Man named Christ that lived during the time that was later written about in the Bible. The Bible, of course, had no relevance to any of the historical findings and realizations the scientific community came to in the discovery of the existance of Jesus Christ.

Speaking to Reuters, Righi, 76, sounded frustrated by the case and baffled as to why Cascioli -- who, like him, came from the town of Bagnoregio -- singled him out in his crusade against the Church.
"We're both from Bagnoregio, both of us. We were in seminary together. Then he took a different path and we didn't see each other anymore," Righi said.
"Since I'm a priest, and I write in the parish newspaper, he is now suing me because I 'trick' the people."
Righi claims there is plenty of evidence to support the existence of Jesus, including historical texts.
He also claims that justice is on his side. The judge presiding over the hearing has tried, repeatedly, to dismiss the case -- prompting appeals from Cascioli.
"Cascioli says he didn't exist. And I said that he did," he said. "The judge will to decide if Christ exists or not."
Even Cascioli admits that the odds are against him, especially in Roman Catholic Italy.
"It would take a miracle to win," he joked.

What an ass.

1 Comments:

At 10:27 AM, Blogger Addy said...

I actually saw this on Yahoo, but by the time I was ready to post a link to it, it had already been taken off of the "breaking news" section

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Free Web Counter
hit Counter